What are the chances of seeing a Double-toothed Kite in Henri Pittier National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 333rd most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Double-toothed Kite in Henri Pittier National Park?
April
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Double-toothed Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Double-toothed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Double-toothed Kite?
37th of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Double-toothed Kite sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 37th at under 5%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%), San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%) and Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Double-toothed Kite live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Double-toothed Kite that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 10%), Black Hawk-Eagle (about 10%) and Common Black-Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Double-toothed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Double-toothed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.