What are the chances of seeing a Double-toothed Kite in Palo Verde National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite sighting in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 234th most-seen of the 274 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Double-toothed Kite in Palo Verde National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Double-toothed Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Double-toothed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Palo Verde National Park the best place to see a Double-toothed Kite?
43rd of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Double-toothed Kite sightings, Palo Verde National Park ranks 43rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%), San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%) and Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Double-toothed Kite live in Palo Verde National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Double-toothed Kite that you can see in Palo Verde National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Snail Kite (about 30%), Roadside Hawk (about 20%) and Common Black-Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Double-toothed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Double-toothed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Palo Verde National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.