What are the chances of seeing a Double-toothed Kite in Tikal National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite sighting in Tikal National Park on a given day, based on 102 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 164th most-seen of the 300 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Double-toothed Kite in Tikal National Park?
April and November–February
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite in Tikal National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March and May–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Double-toothed Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Double-toothed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tikal National Park the best place to see a Double-toothed Kite?
14th of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Double-toothed Kite sightings, Tikal National Park ranks 14th at about 10%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%), San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%) and Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Double-toothed Kite live in Tikal National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Double-toothed Kite that you can see in Tikal National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 50%), Plumbeous Kite (about 20%) and Ornate Hawk-Eagle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Double-toothed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Double-toothed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Tikal National Park (102 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.