Nyctanassa violacea
Silhouette: Sheatherius · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
The yellow-crowned night heron (Nyctanassa violacea) is one of two species of night heron in the genus Nyctanassa. Unlike the black-crowned night heron, which has a worldwide distribution, the yellow-crowned is restricted to the Americas. It is known as the bihoreau violacé in French and the pedrete corona clara or yaboa común in some Spanish-speaking countries.
The yellow-crowned night heron was formally described by the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in 1758 in the tenth edition of his Systema Naturae. He placed it with herons, cranes and egrets in the genus Ardea and coined the binomial name Ardea violacea. Linnaeus based his account on the "crested bittern" that had been described in 1729–1732 by the English naturalist Mark Catesby in the first volume of his The Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands. Linnaeus specified the type locality as North America, but this has been restricted to the Carolinas following Catesby. The yellow-crowned night heron is now placed together with the extinct Bermuda night heron in the genus Nyctanassa that was introduced in 1887 by the Norwegian born zoologist Leonhard Stejneger. Its congener, the Bermuda night... Wikipedia →
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guayaquil | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | |
| 2 | São Luís | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Panama City | 🇵🇦 Panama | |
| 4 | Miami | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 5 | Monterrey | 🇲🇽 México | |
| 6 | Houston | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 7 | Recife | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 8 | Austin | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 9 | San Antonio | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 10 | Havana | 🇨🇺 Cuba |
| # | Zoo / Centre | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sedgwick County Zoo | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Saint Louis Zoo | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 3 | Virginia Zoological Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Houston Zoo | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 5 | San Antonio Zoo | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 6 | Henry Vilas Zoo | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 7 | Salisbury Zoo | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 8 | Zoológico Tamatán | 🇲🇽 Mexico | |
| 9 | Aquarium of the Pacific | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 10 | Florida Aquarium | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 11 | South Carolina Aquarium | 🇺🇸 United States |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-crowned Night-Heron sighting in Tikal National Park on a given day, based on 89 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 175th most-seen of the 300 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January–March and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-crowned Night-Heron in Tikal National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–October and December, the lowest months. Those are among Tikal National Park's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain a month against 190 mm in June.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-crowned Night-Heron sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
33rd of 51
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Yellow-crowned Night-Heron sightings, Tikal National Park ranks 33rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Caroni Swamp (Trinidad and Tobago, about 50%), Utría National Natural Park (Colombia, about 40%) and Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Same family: Ardeidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-crowned Night-Heron that you can see in Tikal National Park (family Ardeidae, Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns) are Boat-billed Heron (about 20%), Bare-throated Tiger Heron (about 20%) and Little Blue Heron (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-crowned Night-Heron is recorded against all the birds logged in Tikal National Park (89 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
