What are the chances of seeing a Gull-billed Tern in Yala National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Gull-billed Tern sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 292 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 73rd most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gull-billed Tern in Yala National Park?
November
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Gull-billed Tern in Yala National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April to July, the lowest months. That is one of Yala National Park's wettest months, with about 340 mm of rain against 35 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Gull-billed Tern?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gull-billed Tern sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Gull-billed Tern?
3rd of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Gull-billed Tern sightings, Yala National Park ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Lake Nakuru National Park (Kenya, about 40%) and Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Gull-billed Tern live in Yala National Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Gull-billed Tern that you can see in Yala National Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Whiskered Tern (about 40%), Little Tern (about 20%) and White-winged Tern (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gull-billed Tern sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gull-billed Tern is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (292 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.