What are the chances of seeing a Common Sandpiper in Yala National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Common Sandpiper sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 453 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 39th most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Sandpiper in Yala National Park?
November
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Common Sandpiper in Yala National Park on a given day, against about 10% in July, the lowest month. That is one of Yala National Park's wettest months, with about 340 mm of rain against 35 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Common Sandpiper?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Sandpiper sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Common Sandpiper?
5th of 109
Of the 109 parks where we can rate Common Sandpiper sightings, Yala National Park ranks 5th at about 50%. The best odds are in Sundarbans National Park (India, about 80%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 60%) and Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Sandpiper live in Yala National Park?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Common Sandpiper that you can see in Yala National Park (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Common Redshank (about 40%), Wood Sandpiper (about 40%) and Marsh Sandpiper (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Sandpiper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Sandpiper is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (453 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.