What are the chances of seeing a Double-toothed Kite in Brownsberg Nature Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 36 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 117th most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Double-toothed Kite in Brownsberg Nature Park?
February, April and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against under 5% in November, the lowest month. May to July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Double-toothed Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Double-toothed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Double-toothed Kite?
3rd of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Double-toothed Kite sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%) and San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Double-toothed Kite live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Double-toothed Kite that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are American Swallow-tailed Kite (about 70%), Short-tailed Hawk (about 30%) and Broad-winged Hawk (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Double-toothed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Double-toothed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (36 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.