What are the chances of seeing a Plumbeous Kite in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 81st most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plumbeous Kite in Brownsberg Nature Park?
February, October and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against about 10% in April and September, the lowest months. May to July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Plumbeous Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plumbeous Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Plumbeous Kite?
7th of 48
Of the 48 parks where we can rate Plumbeous Kite sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park ranks 7th at about 20%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 30%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Plumbeous Kite live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Plumbeous Kite that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are American Swallow-tailed Kite (about 70%), Short-tailed Hawk (about 30%) and Broad-winged Hawk (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plumbeous Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plumbeous Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.