What are the chances of seeing a Golden-winged Warbler in Carara National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-winged Warbler sighting in Carara National Park on a given day, based on 161 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 271st most-seen of the 414 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-winged Warbler in Carara National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-winged Warbler in Carara National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-winged Warbler?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-winged Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Carara National Park the best place to see a Golden-winged Warbler?
24th of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Golden-winged Warbler sightings, Carara National Park ranks 24th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 20%), Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 20%) and La Tigra National Park (Honduras, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Golden-winged Warbler live in Carara National Park?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the Golden-winged Warbler that you can see in Carara National Park (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Yellow Warbler (about 40%), Northern Waterthrush (about 30%) and Chestnut-sided Warbler (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-winged Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-winged Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Carara National Park (161 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.