What are the chances of seeing a Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet in Goiânia?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet sighting in Goiânia on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 118th most-seen of the 174 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet in Goiânia?
July and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet in Goiânia on a given day, against under 5% in August and October–June, the lowest months. Those are among Goiânia's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain a month against 240 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Goiânia the best place to see a Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet?
28th of 38
Of the 38 cities where we can rate Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet sightings, Goiânia ranks 28th at under 5%. The best odds are in Lima (Peru, about 40%), Quito (Ecuador, about 40%) and Guayaquil (Ecuador, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet live in Goiânia?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet that you can see in Goiânia (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 90%), Common Tody-Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Goiânia (23 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.