What are the chances of seeing a Double-toothed Kite in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite sighting in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 211th most-seen of the 285 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Double-toothed Kite in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Double-toothed Kite in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Double-toothed Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Double-toothed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tayrona National Natural Park the best place to see a Double-toothed Kite?
40th of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Double-toothed Kite sightings, Tayrona National Natural Park ranks 40th at under 5%. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%), San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%) and Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Double-toothed Kite live in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Double-toothed Kite that you can see in Tayrona National Natural Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Common Black-Hawk (about 30%), Gray-lined Hawk (about 10%) and Broad-winged Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Double-toothed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Double-toothed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Tayrona National Natural Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.