What are the chances of seeing a Broad-winged Hawk in Tayrona National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-winged Hawk sighting in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, based on 155 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 92nd most-seen of the 285 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad-winged Hawk in Tayrona National Natural Park?
November to January
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-winged Hawk in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Broad-winged Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad-winged Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tayrona National Natural Park the best place to see a Broad-winged Hawk?
23rd of 69
Of the 69 parks where we can rate Broad-winged Hawk sightings, Tayrona National Natural Park ranks 23rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 30%), Cahuita National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Chagres National Park (Panama, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Broad-winged Hawk live in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Same genus: Buteo
The closest relatives of the Broad-winged Hawk that you can see in Tayrona National Natural Park (genus Buteo, Buteos) are Gray-lined Hawk (about 10%) and Short-tailed Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad-winged Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad-winged Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Tayrona National Natural Park (155 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.