What are the chances of seeing a Black-winged Stilt in Akagera National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Stilt sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 260th most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-winged Stilt in Akagera National Park?
September–October and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Stilt in Akagera National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–August and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-winged Stilt?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-winged Stilt sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Black-winged Stilt?
58th of 72
Of the 72 parks where we can rate Black-winged Stilt sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 58th at under 5%. The best odds are in Doñana National Park (Spain, about 70%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 60%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-winged Stilt live in Akagera National Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Black-winged Stilt that you can see in Akagera National Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are African Wattled Lapwing (about 60%), Spur-winged Lapwing (about 50%) and African Jacana (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-winged Stilt sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-winged Stilt is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.