What are the chances of seeing a Ruddy Quail-Dove in Itatiaia National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Quail-Dove sighting in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, based on 71 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 215th most-seen of the 352 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruddy Quail-Dove in Itatiaia National Park?
January and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Quail-Dove in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–August and October–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ruddy Quail-Dove?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruddy Quail-Dove sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Itatiaia National Park the best place to see a Ruddy Quail-Dove?
21st of 46
Of the 46 parks where we can rate Ruddy Quail-Dove sightings, Itatiaia National Park ranks 21st at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 30%), Los Haitises National Park (Dominican Republic, about 20%) and Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ruddy Quail-Dove live in Itatiaia National Park?
Same family: Columbidae
The closest relatives of the Ruddy Quail-Dove that you can see in Itatiaia National Park (family Columbidae, Pigeons and Doves) are Picazuro Pigeon (about 60%), Plumbeous Pigeon (about 40%) and Ruddy Ground-Dove (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruddy Quail-Dove sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruddy Quail-Dove is recorded against all the birds logged in Itatiaia National Park (71 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.