What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-faced Grassquit in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-faced Grassquit sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 278th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-faced Grassquit in Marino Ballena National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-faced Grassquit in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-faced Grassquit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-faced Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Yellow-faced Grassquit?
42nd of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Yellow-faced Grassquit sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 42nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 60%), Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 60%) and Los Haitises National Park (Dominican Republic, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Yellow-faced Grassquit live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-faced Grassquit that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Scarlet-rumped Tanager (about 70%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 50%) and Bananaquit (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-faced Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-faced Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.