What are the chances of seeing a Black-winged Stilt in Masai Mara National Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Stilt sighting in Masai Mara National Reserve on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 300th most-seen of the 398 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-winged Stilt in Masai Mara National Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Stilt in Masai Mara National Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-winged Stilt?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-winged Stilt sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Masai Mara National Reserve the best place to see a Black-winged Stilt?
65th of 72
Of the 72 parks where we can rate Black-winged Stilt sightings, Masai Mara National Reserve ranks 65th at under 5%. The best odds are in Doñana National Park (Spain, about 70%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 60%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-winged Stilt live in Masai Mara National Reserve?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Black-winged Stilt that you can see in Masai Mara National Reserve (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Crowned Lapwing (about 50%), African Wattled Lapwing (about 40%) and Spur-winged Lapwing (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-winged Stilt sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-winged Stilt is recorded against all the birds logged in Masai Mara National Reserve (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.