


Eurasian Coot
Fulica atra
Silhouette: Andy Wilson · PhyloPic
- KingdomAnimalia (Animals)
- PhylumChordata (Chordates)
- ClassAves (Birds)
- OrderGruiformes (Cranes, Rails, and Allies)
- FamilyRallidae (Rails, Gallinules, and Coots)
- GenusFulica (Coots)
- SpeciesFulica atra (Eurasian Coot)
In 3 days ~10%
About the Eurasian Coot
The Eurasian coot (Fulica atra), also known as the common coot or Australian coot, is a member of the rail and crake bird family, the Rallidae. It is found in Europe, Asia, Australia, New Zealand and parts of North Africa. It has a slaty-black body, a glossy black head and a white bill with a white frontal shield. The sexes are similar in appearance.
The Eurasian coot was formally described by the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in 1758 in the tenth edition of his Systema Naturae under its current binomial name Fulica atra. Linnaeus specified the locality as Europe but this is now restricted to Sweden. The binomial name is from Latin: Fulica means 'coot', and atra means 'black'.
Four subspecies are recognised: An extinct subspecies F. atra pontica has been described from the Chalcolithic (around 4800–4400 BP) from the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. The Eurasian coot is 36–38... Wikipedia →
Recent sightings of Eurasian Coot in Triglav National Park
LIVEiNaturalistGlobal Distribution
Parks Where Found
Cities Where Found
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amsterdam | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | |
| 2 | Rotterdam [The Hague] | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | |
| 3 | Copenhagen | 🇩🇰 Denmark | |
| 4 | London | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 5 | Turin | 🇮🇹 Italy | |
| 6 | Liverpool | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 7 | Birmingham | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 8 | Perth | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 9 | Brussels | 🇧🇪 Belgium | |
| 10 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia |
Zoos & Centres Where Found
| # | Zoo / Centre | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whipsnade Zoo | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 2 | Beijing Wildlife Park | 🇨🇳 China | |
| 3 | Szeged Zoo | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 4 | Cleland Wildlife Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 5 | Mansfield Zoo | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 6 | Budapest Zoo & Botanical Garden | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 7 | Marshalls Animal Park | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | |
| 8 | Valencia Bioparc | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 9 | Moonlit Sanctuary Wildlife Conservation Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 10 | Adelaide Zoo | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 11 | The Menagerie, Stowe Gardens | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 12 | Vodní park Čabárna | 🇨🇿 Czechia |
Closest Relatives at Triglav National Park
No species of the same family or order lives in Triglav National Park, so these are its closest relatives here: other birds.
Before you go
What are the chances of seeing a Eurasian Coot in Triglav National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Eurasian Coot sighting in Triglav National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 88th most-seen of the 105 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Eurasian Coot in Triglav National Park?
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Eurasian Coot in Triglav National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Eurasian Coot?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eurasian Coot sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Triglav National Park the best place to see a Eurasian Coot?
31st of 43
Of the 43 parks where we can rate Eurasian Coot sightings, Triglav National Park ranks 31st at under 5%. The best odds are in Doñana National Park (Spain, about 70%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 70%) and Camargue (France, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Where does the Eurasian Coot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eurasian Coot is recorded against all the birds logged in Triglav National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
