What are the chances of seeing a Ruddy Turnstone in Caroni Swamp?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Turnstone sighting in Caroni Swamp on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 150th most-seen of the 169 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ruddy Turnstone in Caroni Swamp?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ruddy Turnstone in Caroni Swamp on a given day, against under 5% in November to September, the lowest months. That is one of Caroni Swamp's wettest months, with about 120 mm of rain against 25 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Ruddy Turnstone?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ruddy Turnstone sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Caroni Swamp the best place to see a Ruddy Turnstone?
51st of 63
Of the 63 parks where we can rate Ruddy Turnstone sightings, Caroni Swamp ranks 51st at under 5%. The best odds are in Padre Island National Seashore (United States, about 80%), Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 60%) and Rottnest Island (Australia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ruddy Turnstone live in Caroni Swamp?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Ruddy Turnstone that you can see in Caroni Swamp (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Spotted Sandpiper (about 60%), Greater Yellowlegs (about 20%) and Lesser Yellowlegs (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ruddy Turnstone sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ruddy Turnstone is recorded against all the birds logged in Caroni Swamp (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.