What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-faced Grassquit in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-faced Grassquit sighting in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 154th most-seen of the 191 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-faced Grassquit in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
March and May–June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-faced Grassquit in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, against under 5% in April and July–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-faced Grassquit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-faced Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Biotopo Cerro Cahuí the best place to see a Yellow-faced Grassquit?
31st of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Yellow-faced Grassquit sightings, Biotopo Cerro Cahuí ranks 31st at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 60%), Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 60%) and Los Haitises National Park (Dominican Republic, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Yellow-faced Grassquit live in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-faced Grassquit that you can see in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Black-headed Saltator (about 20%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 10%) and Morelet's Seedeater (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-faced Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-faced Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.