What are the chances of seeing a Blue-black Grassquit in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit sighting in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 174th most-seen of the 191 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-black Grassquit in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
March and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, against under 5% in April–September and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-black Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Biotopo Cerro Cahuí the best place to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
64th of 73
Of the 73 parks where we can rate Blue-black Grassquit sightings, Biotopo Cerro Cahuí ranks 64th at under 5%. The best odds are in Emas National Park (Brazil, about 70%), Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 50%) and Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit live in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit that you can see in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Black-headed Saltator (about 20%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 10%) and Morelet's Seedeater (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-black Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-black Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.