What are the chances of seeing a Little Tinamou in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Little Tinamou sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 155 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 75th most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Little Tinamou in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
June and October
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Little Tinamou in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Little Tinamou?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Little Tinamou sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Little Tinamou?
6th of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Little Tinamou sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 40%), Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 30%) and Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Little Tinamou live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same genus: Crypturellus
The closest relatives of the Little Tinamou that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (genus Crypturellus, Crypturellus Tinamous) are Cinereous Tinamou (about 30%) and Undulated Tinamou (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Little Tinamou sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Little Tinamou is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (155 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.