What are the chances of seeing a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Cahuita National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sighting in Cahuita National Park on a given day, based on 33 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 192nd most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Cahuita National Park?
September and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Cahuita National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cahuita National Park the best place to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher?
28th of 51
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sightings, Cahuita National Park ranks 28th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%), Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 20%) and Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher live in Cahuita National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher that you can see in Cahuita National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Cahuita National Park (33 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.