What are the chances of seeing a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 135 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 106th most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Lago de Yojoa?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in October to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher?
5th of 51
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%), Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 20%) and Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 70%), Social Flycatcher (about 60%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (135 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.