What are the chances of seeing a Plumbeous Kite in Anavilhanas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 101 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 55th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plumbeous Kite in Anavilhanas National Park?
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March, September and November, the lowest months. That is one of Anavilhanas National Park's driest months, with about 100 mm of rain against 340 mm in March.
What time of day is best to see a Plumbeous Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plumbeous Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Plumbeous Kite?
6th of 48
Of the 48 parks where we can rate Plumbeous Kite sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 30%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Plumbeous Kite live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Plumbeous Kite that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 30%), Great Black-Hawk (about 20%) and Black Hawk-Eagle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plumbeous Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plumbeous Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (101 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.