What are the chances of seeing a Western Wood-Pewee in Badlands National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Western Wood-Pewee sighting in Badlands National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 88th most-seen of the 120 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Western Wood-Pewee in Badlands National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Western Wood-Pewee in Badlands National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Western Wood-Pewee?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Western Wood-Pewee sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Badlands National Park the best place to see a Western Wood-Pewee?
44th of 65
Of the 65 parks where we can rate Western Wood-Pewee sightings, Badlands National Park ranks 44th at under 5%. The best odds are in Yosemite National Park (United States, about 40%), Guadalupe Mountains National Park (United States, about 30%) and Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Western Wood-Pewee live in Badlands National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Western Wood-Pewee that you can see in Badlands National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Say's Phoebe (about 50%), Western Kingbird (about 40%) and Eastern Kingbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Western Wood-Pewee sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Western Wood-Pewee is recorded against all the birds logged in Badlands National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.