What are the chances of seeing an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher in Carara National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sighting in Carara National Park on a given day, based on 879 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 151st most-seen of the 414 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher in Carara National Park?
April and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher in Carara National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May–August and October–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Carara National Park the best place to see an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher?
16th of 51
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sightings, Carara National Park ranks 16th at about 10%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 20%), Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher live in Carara National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher that you can see in Carara National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), Tropical Kingbird (about 50%) and Social Flycatcher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Carara National Park (879 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.