What are the chances of seeing a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Cusuco National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sighting in Cusuco National Park on a given day, based on 91 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 90th most-seen of the 250 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Cusuco National Park?
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Cusuco National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cusuco National Park the best place to see a Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher?
11th of 51
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sightings, Cusuco National Park ranks 11th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%), Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 20%) and Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher live in Cusuco National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher that you can see in Cusuco National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 50%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Yellow-olive Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Cusuco National Park (91 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.