What are the chances of seeing an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 237th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
March and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in April–July and September–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see an Ochre-bellied Flycatcher?
44th of 51
Of the 51 parks where we can rate Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 44th at under 5%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 20%), Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Lesser Kiskadee (about 50%) and Great Kiskadee (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ochre-bellied Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.