What are the chances of seeing an Amazon Kingfisher in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report an Amazon Kingfisher sighting in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 82 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 48th most-seen of the 240 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Amazon Kingfisher in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
May
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Amazon Kingfisher in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against about 10% in April, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see an Amazon Kingfisher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Amazon Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve the best place to see an Amazon Kingfisher?
5th of 50
Of the 50 parks where we can rate Amazon Kingfisher sightings, Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve ranks 5th at about 30%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 70%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 60%) and Tortuguero National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Amazon Kingfisher live in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
Same genus: Chloroceryle
The closest relatives of the Amazon Kingfisher that you can see in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (genus Chloroceryle, American Green Kingfishers) are Green Kingfisher (about 30%) and American Pygmy Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Amazon Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Amazon Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (82 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.