What are the chances of seeing a Green Kingfisher in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Green Kingfisher sighting in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 92 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 40th most-seen of the 240 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green Kingfisher in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
May
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Green Kingfisher in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against about 10% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Green Kingfisher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Green Kingfisher?
3rd of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Green Kingfisher sightings, Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 50%) and Carara National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Green Kingfisher live in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
Same genus: Chloroceryle
The closest relatives of the Green Kingfisher that you can see in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (genus Chloroceryle, American Green Kingfishers) are Amazon Kingfisher (about 30%) and American Pygmy Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (92 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.