What are the chances of seeing a Plumbeous Kite in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite sighting in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 187th most-seen of the 240 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plumbeous Kite in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
March to June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in July to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Plumbeous Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plumbeous Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Plumbeous Kite?
22nd of 48
Of the 48 parks where we can rate Plumbeous Kite sightings, Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve ranks 22nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 30%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Plumbeous Kite live in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Plumbeous Kite that you can see in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 40%), Gray-lined Hawk (about 10%) and White Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plumbeous Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plumbeous Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.