What are the chances of seeing a Long-billed Gnatwren in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Long-billed Gnatwren sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 291st most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Long-billed Gnatwren in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Long-billed Gnatwren in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Long-billed Gnatwren?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Long-billed Gnatwren sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Long-billed Gnatwren?
47th of 54
Of the 54 parks where we can rate Long-billed Gnatwren sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 47th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 40%), Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 30%) and Santa Rosa National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Long-billed Gnatwren live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Long-billed Gnatwren that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Yellow-rumped Cacique (about 70%), Red-capped Cardinal (about 60%) and Russet-backed Oropendola (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Long-billed Gnatwren sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Long-billed Gnatwren is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.