What are the chances of seeing a Plumbeous Kite in Main Ridge Forest Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite sighting in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 93rd most-seen of the 103 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plumbeous Kite in Main Ridge Forest Reserve?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months. That is one of Main Ridge Forest Reserve's driest months, with about 80 mm of rain against 230 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Plumbeous Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plumbeous Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Main Ridge Forest Reserve the best place to see a Plumbeous Kite?
32nd of 48
Of the 48 parks where we can rate Plumbeous Kite sightings, Main Ridge Forest Reserve ranks 32nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 30%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Plumbeous Kite live in Main Ridge Forest Reserve?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Plumbeous Kite that you can see in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Great Black-Hawk (about 40%) and Broad-winged Hawk (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plumbeous Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plumbeous Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.