What are the chances of seeing a Blue Dacnis in Emas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Dacnis sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 45 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 93rd most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue Dacnis in Emas National Park?
August and September
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Dacnis in Emas National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June and November, the lowest months. Those are among Emas National Park's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain a month against 190 mm in January. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Blue Dacnis?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue Dacnis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Blue Dacnis?
14th of 44
Of the 44 parks where we can rate Blue Dacnis sightings, Emas National Park ranks 14th at about 20%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 60%), Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 50%) and Itatiaia National Park (Brazil, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue Dacnis live in Emas National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Blue Dacnis that you can see in Emas National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Black-throated Saltator (about 70%), Blue-black Grassquit (about 70%) and Saffron Finch (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue Dacnis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue Dacnis is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (45 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.