What are the chances of seeing a Grey Wagtail in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Wagtail sighting in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park on a given day, based on 98 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 35th most-seen of the 122 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Wagtail in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
May
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Wagtail in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June and July, the lowest months. January–April and October–November have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Wagtail?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Wagtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park the best place to see a Grey Wagtail?
20th of 70
Of the 70 parks where we can rate Grey Wagtail sightings, Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park ranks 20th at about 30%. The best odds are in Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 60%), Plitvice Lakes National Park (Croatia, about 60%) and Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Grey Wagtail live in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park?
Same genus: Motacilla
The closest relatives of the Grey Wagtail that you can see in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (genus Motacilla, Wagtails) are Citrine Wagtail (about 20%), White Wagtail (about 10%) and Eastern Yellow Wagtail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Wagtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Wagtail is recorded against all the birds logged in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (98 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.