What are the chances of seeing a Grey Wagtail in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Wagtail sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 132 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 59th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Wagtail in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
October
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Wagtail in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to July, the lowest months. January has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Wagtail?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Wagtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Grey Wagtail?
34th of 70
Of the 70 parks where we can rate Grey Wagtail sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 34th at about 20%. The best odds are in Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 60%), Plitvice Lakes National Park (Croatia, about 60%) and Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Grey Wagtail live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Grey Wagtail that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher (about 70%), Gray-throated Babbler (about 60%) and Golden Babbler (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Wagtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Wagtail is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (132 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.