What are the chances of seeing a Black-winged Kite in Meru National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Kite sighting in Meru National Park on a given day, based on 24 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 126th most-seen of the 243 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-winged Kite in Meru National Park?
January–February, April, June and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Kite in Meru National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March, September and November–December, the lowest months. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Black-winged Kite?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-winged Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Meru National Park the best place to see a Black-winged Kite?
24th of 85
Of the 85 parks where we can rate Black-winged Kite sightings, Meru National Park ranks 24th at about 20%. The best odds are in West Coast National Park (South Africa, about 70%), Pilanesberg National Park (South Africa, about 40%) and Samburu National Reserve (Kenya, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-winged Kite live in Meru National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Black-winged Kite that you can see in Meru National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Bateleur (about 50%), Eastern Chanting-Goshawk (about 50%) and Tawny Eagle (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-winged Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-winged Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Meru National Park (24 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.