What are the chances of seeing a Bright-rumped Attila in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bright-rumped Attila sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 89 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 140th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bright-rumped Attila in Chirripó National Park?
February–May and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bright-rumped Attila in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–August and November–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bright-rumped Attila?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bright-rumped Attila sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Bright-rumped Attila?
38th of 57
Of the 57 parks where we can rate Bright-rumped Attila sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 38th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 40%), Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 30%) and Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Bright-rumped Attila live in Chirripó National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Bright-rumped Attila that you can see in Chirripó National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet (about 40%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bright-rumped Attila sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bright-rumped Attila is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (89 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.