What are the chances of seeing a Baltimore Oriole in Soberanía National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Baltimore Oriole sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 1,511 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 144th most-seen of the 449 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baltimore Oriole in Soberanía National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Baltimore Oriole in Soberanía National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to September, the lowest months. That is one of Soberanía National Park's wettest months, with about 330 mm of rain against 25 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Baltimore Oriole?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baltimore Oriole sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Baltimore Oriole?
33rd of 64
Of the 64 parks where we can rate Baltimore Oriole sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 33rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 70%), Poás Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 60%) and Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (Guatemala, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Baltimore Oriole live in Soberanía National Park?
Same genus: Icterus
The closest relatives of the Baltimore Oriole that you can see in Soberanía National Park (genus Icterus, New World Orioles) are Yellow-tailed Oriole (about 20%) and Yellow-backed Oriole (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baltimore Oriole sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baltimore Oriole is recorded against all the birds logged in Soberanía National Park (1,511 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.