What are the chances of seeing an Olive-sided Flycatcher in Volcán Barú National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Olive-sided Flycatcher sighting in Volcán Barú National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 177th most-seen of the 296 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Olive-sided Flycatcher in Volcán Barú National Park?
April–May and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Olive-sided Flycatcher in Volcán Barú National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–August and October–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Olive-sided Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Olive-sided Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Volcán Barú National Park the best place to see an Olive-sided Flycatcher?
38th of 73
Of the 73 parks where we can rate Olive-sided Flycatcher sightings, Volcán Barú National Park ranks 38th at under 5%. The best odds are in Glacier National Park (United States, about 30%), Yosemite National Park (United States, about 20%) and Gros Morne National Park (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Olive-sided Flycatcher live in Volcán Barú National Park?
Same genus: Contopus
The closest relatives of the Olive-sided Flycatcher that you can see in Volcán Barú National Park (genus Contopus, Pewees) are Dark Pewee (about 30%) and Ochraceous Pewee (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Olive-sided Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Olive-sided Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Volcán Barú National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.