What are the chances of seeing an Olive-sided Flycatcher in Anavilhanas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Olive-sided Flycatcher sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 258th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Olive-sided Flycatcher in Anavilhanas National Park?
November
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Olive-sided Flycatcher in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in December to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Olive-sided Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Olive-sided Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see an Olive-sided Flycatcher?
43rd of 73
Of the 73 parks where we can rate Olive-sided Flycatcher sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 43rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Glacier National Park (United States, about 30%), Yosemite National Park (United States, about 20%) and Gros Morne National Park (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Olive-sided Flycatcher live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Olive-sided Flycatcher that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Snethlage's Tody-Tyrant (about 40%) and Great Kiskadee (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Olive-sided Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Olive-sided Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.