What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-sided Warbler sighting in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 50 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 164th most-seen of the 297 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in June to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-sided Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celestún Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler?
42nd of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Chestnut-sided Warbler sightings, Celestún Biosphere Reserve ranks 42nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 40%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Chestnut-sided Warbler live in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-sided Warbler that you can see in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Yellow Warbler (about 60%), Northern Parula (about 20%) and American Redstart (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-sided Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-sided Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (50 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.