What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Congaree National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-sided Warbler sighting in Congaree National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 127th most-seen of the 148 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Congaree National Park?
September and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-sided Warbler in Congaree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-sided Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Congaree National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-sided Warbler?
51st of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Chestnut-sided Warbler sightings, Congaree National Park ranks 51st at under 5%. The best odds are in Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 40%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Chestnut-sided Warbler live in Congaree National Park?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-sided Warbler that you can see in Congaree National Park (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Pine Warbler (about 60%), Northern Parula (about 50%) and Yellow-throated Warbler (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-sided Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-sided Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Congaree National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.