What are the chances of seeing a Zitting Cisticola in Keoladeo National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Zitting Cisticola sighting in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, based on 96 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 175th most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Zitting Cisticola in Keoladeo National Park?
June and July
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Zitting Cisticola in Keoladeo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and December–May, the lowest months. Those are among Keoladeo National Park's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain a month against 5 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Zitting Cisticola?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Zitting Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Keoladeo National Park the best place to see a Zitting Cisticola?
49th of 75
Of the 75 parks where we can rate Zitting Cisticola sightings, Keoladeo National Park ranks 49th at under 5%. The best odds are in Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 60%), Camargue (France, about 40%) and Doñana National Park (Spain, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Zitting Cisticola live in Keoladeo National Park?
Same family: Cisticolidae
The closest relatives of the Zitting Cisticola that you can see in Keoladeo National Park (family Cisticolidae, Cisticolas and Allies) are Ashy Prinia (about 60%), Plain Prinia (about 50%) and Common Tailorbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Zitting Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Zitting Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Keoladeo National Park (96 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.