What are the chances of seeing a Southern Lapwing in Carara National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Southern Lapwing sighting in Carara National Park on a given day, based on 1,337 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 102nd most-seen of the 414 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Southern Lapwing in Carara National Park?
February–September and November–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Southern Lapwing in Carara National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Southern Lapwing?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Southern Lapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Carara National Park the best place to see a Southern Lapwing?
26th of 61
Of the 61 parks where we can rate Southern Lapwing sightings, Carara National Park ranks 26th at about 20%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 80%), Nahuel Huapi National Park (Argentina, about 60%) and Torres del Paine National Park (Chile, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Southern Lapwing live in Carara National Park?
Same family: Charadriidae
The closest relatives of the Southern Lapwing that you can see in Carara National Park (family Charadriidae, Plovers and Lapwings) are Semipalmated Plover (about 20%) and Black-bellied Plover (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Southern Lapwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Southern Lapwing is recorded against all the birds logged in Carara National Park (1,337 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.