What are the chances of seeing a Bigua cormorant in Palo Verde National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bigua cormorant sighting in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, based on 147 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 93rd most-seen of the 274 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bigua cormorant in Palo Verde National Park?
June–October and December–March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bigua cormorant in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bigua cormorant?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bigua cormorant sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Palo Verde National Park the best place to see a Bigua cormorant?
36th of 77
Of the 77 parks where we can rate Bigua cormorant sightings, Palo Verde National Park ranks 36th at about 10%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 80%), Península Valdés (Argentina, about 80%) and Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bigua cormorant live in Palo Verde National Park?
Same order: Suliformes
The closest relatives of the Bigua cormorant that you can see in Palo Verde National Park (order Suliformes, Gannets, Cormorants, and Allies) are Anhinga (about 40%) and Magnificent Frigatebird (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bigua cormorant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bigua cormorant is recorded against all the birds logged in Palo Verde National Park (147 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.