What are the chances of seeing a Black-and-white Warbler in Tikal National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Black-and-white Warbler sighting in Tikal National Park on a given day, based on 1,511 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 14th most-seen of the 300 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-and-white Warbler in Tikal National Park?
January
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Black-and-white Warbler in Tikal National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June and July, the lowest months. That is one of Tikal National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain against 190 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Black-and-white Warbler?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-and-white Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tikal National Park the best place to see a Black-and-white Warbler?
3rd of 77
Of the 77 parks where we can rate Black-and-white Warbler sightings, Tikal National Park ranks 3rd at about 50%. The best odds are in Gros Morne National Park (Canada, about 60%) and Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-and-white Warbler live in Tikal National Park?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the Black-and-white Warbler that you can see in Tikal National Park (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Magnolia Warbler (about 60%), Kentucky Warbler (about 40%) and Hooded Warbler (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-and-white Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-and-white Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Tikal National Park (1,511 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.