What are the chances of seeing an American Swallow-tailed Kite in Lago de Yojoa?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an American Swallow-tailed Kite sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 39 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 176th most-seen of the 263 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an American Swallow-tailed Kite in Lago de Yojoa?
February to June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an American Swallow-tailed Kite in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in July to January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an American Swallow-tailed Kite?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most American Swallow-tailed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see an American Swallow-tailed Kite?
37th of 64
Of the 64 parks where we can rate American Swallow-tailed Kite sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 37th at under 5%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 70%), Chagres National Park (Panama, about 40%) and Emas National Park (Brazil, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the American Swallow-tailed Kite live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the American Swallow-tailed Kite that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Snail Kite (about 60%), Roadside Hawk (about 20%) and Gray-lined Hawk (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the American Swallow-tailed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the American Swallow-tailed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Lago de Yojoa (39 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.