What are the chances of seeing a Broad-winged Hawk in Chirripó National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-winged Hawk sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 309 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 59th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad-winged Hawk in Chirripó National Park?
March
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-winged Hawk in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to September, the lowest months. That is one of Chirripó National Park's driest months, with about 120 mm of rain against 690 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Broad-winged Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad-winged Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Broad-winged Hawk?
5th of 69
Of the 69 parks where we can rate Broad-winged Hawk sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 30%), Cahuita National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Chagres National Park (Panama, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Broad-winged Hawk live in Chirripó National Park?
Same genus: Buteo
The closest relatives of the Broad-winged Hawk that you can see in Chirripó National Park (genus Buteo, Buteos) are Red-tailed Hawk (about 10%) and Short-tailed Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad-winged Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad-winged Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (309 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.