What are the chances of seeing a Piratic Flycatcher in Cahuita National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher sighting in Cahuita National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 244th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Piratic Flycatcher in Cahuita National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher in Cahuita National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Piratic Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cahuita National Park the best place to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
55th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Piratic Flycatcher sightings, Cahuita National Park ranks 55th at under 5%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher live in Cahuita National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher that you can see in Cahuita National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Piratic Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Piratic Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Cahuita National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.